3.8 Proceedings Paper

Prototypical Convolutional Neural Network for a Phrase-Based Explanation of Sentiment Classification

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_35

Keywords

Prototypes; Explainable neural networks; Text classification; Phrase-based explanation

Funding

  1. TAILOR - EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [952215]
  2. Polish National Science Centre grant [2016/22/E/ST6/00299]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new prototype-based convolutional neural architecture for text classification, which offers faithful predictions' explanations compared to traditional attention mechanisms. It also demonstrates that dynamic tuning of the number of prototypes can lead to performance gains.
The attention mechanisms are often used to support an interpretation of neural network based classification of texts by highlighting words to which the network paid attention while making a prediction. Following recent studies, the attention technique does not always provide a faithful explanation of the model. Thus, in this paper we study another idea of prototype-based neural networks. Although for texts they obtain promising results, they may provide explanations in the form of comparisons of whole (potentially long) documents or also run into problems with providing reliable explanations. To overcome it, in this work a new prototype-based convolutional neural architecture for text classification is introduced, which provides predictions' explanations in the form of similarities to phrases from the training set. The experimental evaluation demonstrates that the proposed network obtains similar classification performance to the black-box convolutional networks while providing faithful explanations. Moreover, it is shown that a new method for dynamic tuning of the number of prototypes introduced in this paper offers performance gains against static tuning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available