3.8 Proceedings Paper

Single-Trial Detection of Event-Related Potentials with Integral Shape Averaging: An Application to the Elusive N400

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630271

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Project HP, IDEX UCA-JEDI [ANR-15-IDEX-01]
  2. H2020 MSCA COFUND programme BoostUrCareer [847581]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper introduces an alternative method called Integral Shape Averaging (ISA) and its derivatives for extracting Event-Related Potentials. ISA is robust to varying latencies and affine transforms of shape, making it suitable for cognitive ERPs research.
The estimation of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) from the ambient EEG is a difficult task, usually achieved through the synchronous averaging of an extensive series of trials. However, this technique has some caveats: the ERPs have to be strictly time-locked with similar shape, i.e. emitted with the same latency and the same profile, with minor fluctuations of their amplitudes. Also, the method requires a huge number of valid trials (similar to 100) to efficiently raise the ERPs from the EEG trials. In the case of cognitive ERPs, as with the N400, the delivered stimulus has to be different for each trial, the latencies are varying, and the number of available trials is usually low. In this paper, an alternative method, coined Integral Shape Averaging (ISA) and its derivatives are detailed. ISA is robust to varying latencies and affine transforms of shape. Furthermore, a new method coined ISAD can be derived to extract ERPs even from a single trial experiment. The aim here is to illustrate the potential of ISAD for N400 component extraction on real EEG data, with emphasis on its general applicability for ERPs computation and its major assets like reduced experimental protocol. Some insights are also given on its potential use to study ERP variability, through shape and latency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available