3.8 Proceedings Paper

Elastic and Efficient LiDAR Reconstruction for Large-Scale Exploration Tasks

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561736

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ESPRC ORCA Robotics Hub [EP/R026173/1]
  2. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  3. SLAMcore Ltd.
  4. President's PhD Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research presents an efficient, elastic 3D LiDAR reconstruction framework that addresses challenges in large-scale reconstruction. By introducing new submapping techniques and clustering fusion features, the system demonstrates improved scalability in large environments.
We present an efficient, elastic 3D LiDAR reconstruction framework which can reconstruct up to maximum LiDAR ranges (60 m) at multiple frames per second, thus enabling robot exploration in large-scale environments. Our approach only requires a CPU. We focus on three main challenges of large-scale reconstruction: integration of long-range LiDAR scans at high frequency, the capacity to deform the reconstruction after loop closures are detected, and scalability for long-duration exploration. Our system extends upon a state-of-the-art efficient RGB-D volumetric reconstruction technique, called supereight, to support LiDAR scans and a newly developed submapping technique to allow for dynamic correction of the 3D reconstruction. We then introduce a novel pose graph clustering and submap fusion feature to make the proposed system more scalable for large environments. We evaluate the performance using two public datasets including outdoor exploration with a handheld device and a drone, and with a mobile robot exploring an underground room network. Experimental results demonstrate that our system can reconstruct at 3 Hz with 60 m sensor range and similar to 5 cm resolution, while state-of-the-art approaches can only reconstruct to 25 cm resolution or 20 m range at the same frequency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available