3.8 Proceedings Paper

MRI Image Registration Considerably Improves CNN-Based Disease Classification

Journal

MACHINE LEARNING IN CLINICAL NEUROIMAGING
Volume 13001, Issue -, Pages 44-52

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87586-2_5

Keywords

Alzheimer; CNN; Image registration; MRI; Deep learning

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [389563835, TRR 265, 402170461, CRC 1404, 414984028]
  2. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator Grant, USA)
  3. Manfred and Ursula-Muller Stiftung
  4. DOD ADNI (Department of Defense) [W81XWH-12-2-0012]
  5. National Institute on Aging
  6. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  7. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  8. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that image registration can significantly improve the accuracy of machine learning classifiers in detecting AD, with both linear and nonlinear methods showing similar results. Moreover, the dataset split has a strong impact on the classifier performance, with some subjects being easier to classify due to different clinical manifestations or disease progression rates.
Machine learning methods have many promising applications in medical imaging, including the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans. These scans usually undergo several preprocessing steps, including image registration. However, the effect of image registration methods on the performance of the machine learning classifier is poorly understood. In this study, we train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect AD on a dataset preprocessed in three different ways. The scans were registered to a template either linearly or nonlinearly, or were only padded and cropped to the needed size without performing image registration. We show that both linear and nonlinear registration increase the balanced accuracy of the classifier significantly by around 6-7% in comparison to no registration. No significant difference between linear and nonlinear registration was found. The dataset split, although carefully matched for age and sex, affects the classifier performance strongly, suggesting that some subjects are easier to classify than others, possibly due to different clinical manifestations of AD and varying rates of disease progression. In conclusion, we show that for a CNN detecting AD, a prior image registration improves the classifier performance, but the choice of a linear or nonlinear registration method has only little impact on the classification accuracy and can be made based on other constraints such as computational resources or planned further analyses like the use of brain atlases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available