4.7 Article

Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 1466-1478

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.092

Keywords

Environmental Kuznets curve; CO2 emissions; Natural gas and renewable energy consumption; Cross-sectional dependence; BRICS countries

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [17BGL014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is the first attempt to investigate the nexus among per capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, gross domestic product (GDP), and natural gas and renewable energy consumption within the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC), in a 1985-2016 sample of BRICS countries (i.e., Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). For this purpose, panel unit root, cointegration, and causality tests allowing for cross-sectional dependence are conducted. Employing the augmented mean group (AMG) estimator, the results provide strong evidence in favor of the EKC hypothesis for the BRICS countries by proposing that the EKC holds in all five BRICS countries; the turning points (TPs) lie between $4282.90 (India) and $16,553.77 (China), while the turning years (TYs) are estimated to be between 2018 (Russia) and 2035 (India). Furthermore, increasing natural gas and renewable energy consumption lowers CO2 emissions, which indicates that, 1% increase in natural gas and renewable energy consumption for the BRICS countries will decrease CO2 emissions by 0.1641% and 0.2601%, respectively. The causality analysis underscores feedback hypothetical links among CO2 emissions, natural gas consumption, and renewable energy consumption in the long run. Some policy implications are highlighted for BRICS countries' policymakers not only for tackling CO2 emissions, but also for promoting growth in the natural gas and renewable energy industries. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available