3.8 Proceedings Paper

ANNOTATION-EFFICIENT 3D U-NETS FOR BRAIN PLASTICITY NETWORK MAPPING

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9434142

Keywords

Brain plasticity; deep learning; light sheet microscopy; neuron segmentation; weak supervision

Funding

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under Air Force [FA8702-15-D-0001]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) BTO through the DARPA Contracts Management Office [HR0011-17-2-0019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the use of three-dimensional U-Nets for neuronal nuclei segmentation, demonstrating that weakly supervised and semi-supervised methods can reduce the burden of human annotation. By leveraging automated blob detection with classical algorithms to generate noisy labels, the experiments show that weak supervision can outperform fully supervised learning in resource-limited settings. These methods are also extended to analyze the coincidence of multiple fluorescent stains in cleared brain tissue, representing a step towards automated whole-brain analysis of plasticity-related gene expression.
A fundamental challenge in machine learning-based segmentation of large-scale brain microscopy images is the time and domain expertise required by humans to generate ground truth for model training. Weakly supervised and semi-supervised approaches can greatly reduce the burden of human annotation. Here we present a study of three-dimensional U-Nets with varying levels of supervision to perform neuronal nuclei segmentation in light-sheet microscopy volumes. We leverage automated blob detection with classical algorithms to generate noisy labels on a large volume, and our experiments show that weak supervision, with or without additional fine-tuning, can outperform resource-limited fully supervised learning. These methods are extended to analyze coincidence between multiple fluorescent stains in cleared brain tissue. This is an initial step towards automated whole-brain analysis of plasticity-related gene expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available