4.7 Article

The development of China's biomass power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A system dynamics analysis

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 947-961

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.020

Keywords

Biomass power; The development of industry; Feed-in tariff; Renewable portfolio standard; System dynamics; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273088]
  2. Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation [16JDYJB031]
  3. Special Project of Cultivation and Development of Innovation Base [Z171100002217024]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017XS107, 2017XS112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the regulatory policies, feed-in tariffs (FIT) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are the most popular to promote the development of renewable energy power industry. This paper uses system dynamics (SD) to establish models of long-term development of China's biomass power industry under FIT and RPS schemes, and provides a case study by using scenario analysis method. The model, on the one hand, not only clearly shows the complex logical relationship between the factors but also reveals the process of coordination between the two policy tools in the development of the industry. On the other hand, it provides a reference for scholars to study similar problems in different countries, thereby facilitating an understanding of biomass power's long-term sustainable development pattern under FIT and RPS schemes, and helping to provide references for policy-making institutions. The results show that in the perfect competitive market, the implementation of RPS can promote long-term and rapid development of China's biomass power industry given the constraints and actions of the mechanisms of RPS quota proportion, the TGC valid period, and fines, compared with FIT. At the end of the paper, policy implications are offered as references for the government. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available