4.5 Article

Modeling of HVDC System to Improve Estimation of Transient DC Current and Voltages for AC Line-to-Ground FaultAn Actual Case Study in Korea

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en10101543

Keywords

AC line-to-ground fault; estimation of dynamic variations in DC voltage and current; Jeju-Haenam HVDC system; PSS/E simulation environment

Categories

Funding

  1. Electric Power Public Tasks Evaluation & Planning Center (ETEP) - Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy (MOTIE) [70300037]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [70300037] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new modeling method for high voltage direct current (HVDC) systems and associated controllers is presented for the power system simulator for engineering (PSS/E) simulation environment. The aim is to improve the estimation of the transient DC voltage and current in the event of an AC line-to-ground fault. The proposed method consists primary of three interconnected modules for (a) equation conversion; (b) control-mode selection; and (c) DC-line modeling. Simulation case studies were carried out using PSS/E and a power systems computer aided design/electromagnetic transients including DC (PSCAD/EMTDC) model of the Jeju-Haenam HVDC system in Korea. The simulation results are compared with actual operational data and the PSCAD/EMTDC simulation results for an HVDC system during single-phase and three-phase line-to-ground faults, respectively. These comparisons show that the proposed PSS/E modeling method results in the improved estimation of the dynamic variation in the DC voltage and current in the event of an AC network fault, with significant gains in computational efficiency, making it suitable for real-time analysis of HVDC systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available