4.0 Review

Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and perspective

Journal

BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab242

Keywords

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; clinical trials; systematic review; methodology; perspective

Funding

  1. MND Scotland
  2. My Name'5 Doddie Foundation [DOD/14/15]
  3. UK Dementia Research Institute from UK DRI Ltd - UK Medical Research Council
  4. Alzheimer's Society
  5. Alzheimer's Research UK
  6. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  7. Motor Neurone Disease Association [MR/R001162/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wong et al. reviewed historical approaches to clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and highlighted challenges such as lack of sensitive outcome measures and barriers to participation. They suggested that future trials should be more flexible, scalable and efficient in order to address these challenges. Efforts to develop innovative trial designs, especially adaptive platform trials, may offer significant efficiency gains in evaluating drugs for this devastating neurodegenerative disease.
Wong et al. reviewed historical approaches to clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lack of sensitive outcome measures, limitations in resources and barriers to trial participation were challenges for timely and definitive evaluation of drugs in two-arm trials. They concluded that future trials should be more flexible, scalable and efficient. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a progressive and devastating neurodegenerative disease. Despite decades of clinical trials, effective disease-modifying drugs remain scarce. To understand the challenges of trial design and delivery, we performed a systematic review of Phase II, Phase II/III and Phase III amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical drug trials on trial registries and PubMed between 2008 and 2019. We identified 125 trials, investigating 76 drugs and recruiting more than 15 000 people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. About 90% of trials used traditional fixed designs. The limitations in understanding of disease biology, outcome measures, resources and barriers to trial participation in a rapidly progressive, disabling and heterogenous disease hindered timely and definitive evaluation of drugs in two-arm trials. Innovative trial designs, especially adaptive platform trials may offer significant efficiency gains to this end. We propose a flexible and scalable multi-arm, multi-stage trial platform where opportunities to participate in a clinical trial can become the default for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available