4.5 Article

Analyzing the Effects of Key Design Factors of a Negative-Differential-Resistance (NDR) Microfluidic Oscillator-an Equivalent-Circuit-Model Approach

Journal

Publisher

GLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.4208/aamm.OA-2021-0269

Keywords

Microfluidic oscillator; hydroelastics; equivalent circuit model; negative differential resistance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575282]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30915118803, 30916012101]
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Pro-gram of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20 0266]
  4. Nanyang Technological University and Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, under the Agency for Science, Tech-nology and Research (A*STAR, Singapore)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates how the performance of a hydroelastic microfluidic oscillator can be analyzed using a simple equivalent circuit model, where the performance is mainly determined by a bias fluidic resistor and a pressure variant resistor. Numerical study also examines the effects of key design factors on the device robustness, applicable fluid viscosity, flow rate, and transition pressure.
Numerical study on dynamic hydroelastic problems is usually rather complex due to the coupling of fluid and solid mechanics. Here, we demonstrate that the performance of a hydroelastic microfluidic oscillator can be analyzed using a simple equivalent circuit model. Previous studies reveal that its transition from the steady state to the oscillation state follows the negative-differential-resistance (NDR) mechanism. The performance is mainly determined by a bias fluidic resistor, and a pressure variant resistor which further relates to the bending stiffness of the elastic diaphragm and the depth of the oscillation chamber. In this work, a numerical study is conducted to examine the effects of key design factors on the device robustness, the applicable fluid viscosity, the flow rate, and the transition pressure. The underlying physics is interpreted, providing a new perspective on hydroelastic oscillation problems. Relevant findings also provide design guidelines of the NDR fluidic oscillator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available