3.8 Proceedings Paper

WISH: User-centric Bitrate Adaptation for HTTP Adaptive Streaming on Mobile Devices

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/MMSP53017.2021.9733605

Keywords

ABR Algorithms; HTTP Adaptive Streaming; ITU-T P.1203; WISH

Funding

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  2. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development
  3. Christian Doppler Research Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mobile devices are increasingly crucial in online video streaming. The proposed weighted sum model, WISH, enhances video QoE significantly and allows end users to express their preferences for different parameters such as video quality, data usage, and stall events.
Recently, mobile devices have become paramount in online video streaming. Adaptive bitrate (ABR) algorithms of players responsible for selecting the quality of the videos face critical challenges in providing a high Quality of Experience (QoE) for end users. One open issue is how to ensure the optimal experience for heterogeneous devices in the context of extreme variation of mobile broadband networks. Additionally, end users may have different priorities on video quality and data usage (i.e., the amount of data downloaded to the devices through the mobile networks). A generic mechanism for players that enables specification of various policies to meet end users' needs is still missing. In this paper, we propose a weighted sum model, namely WISH, that yields high QoE of the video and allows end users to express their preferences among different parameters (i.e., data usage, stall events, and video quality) of video streaming. WISH has been implemented into ExoPlayer, a popular player used in many mobile applications. The experimental results show that WISH improves the QoE by up to 17.6% while saving 36.4% of data usage compared to state-of-the-art ABR algorithms and provides dynamic adaptation to end users' requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available