3.8 Proceedings Paper

HDR Video Reconstruction: A Coarse-to-fine Network and A Real-world Benchmark Dataset

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00250

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alibaba DAMO Academy
  2. Hong Kong RGC RIF grant [R5001-18]
  3. Hong Kong RGC GRF grant [17203119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a coarse-to-fine deep learning framework for HDR video reconstruction, which includes coarse alignment and pixel blending in the image space followed by more sophisticated alignment and temporal fusion in the feature space to achieve better reconstruction results.
High dynamic range (HDR) video reconstruction from sequences captured with alternating exposures is a very challenging problem. Existing methods often align low dynamic range (LDR) input sequence in the image space using optical flow, and then merge the aligned images to produce HDR output. However, accurate alignment and fusion in the image space are difficult due to the missing details in the over-exposed regions and noise in the under-exposed regions, resulting in unpleasing ghosting artifacts. To enable more accurate alignment and HDR fusion, we introduce a coarse-to-fine deep learning framework for HDR video reconstruction. Firstly, we perform coarse alignment and pixel blending in the image space to estimate the coarse HDR video. Secondly, we conduct more sophisticated alignment and temporal fusion in the feature space of the coarse HDR video to produce better reconstruction. Considering the fact that there is no publicly available dataset for quantitative and comprehensive evaluation of HDR video reconstruction methods, we collect such a benchmark dataset, which contains 97 sequences of static scenes and 184 testing pairs of dynamic scenes. Extensive experiments show that our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods. Our code and dataset can be found at https://guanyingc.github.io/DeepHDRVideo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available