4.4 Article

TERT structural rearrangements in metastatic pheochromocytomas

Journal

ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-17-0306

Keywords

TERT; pheochromocytoma; metastatic; whole genome sequencing; rearrangements

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1108032, APP1053792]
  2. Hillcrest Foundation
  3. Pheo Para Alliance
  4. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  5. Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pheochromocytomas (PC) and paragangliomas (PGL) are endocrine tumors for which the genetic and clinicopathological features of metastatic progression remain incompletely understood. As a result, the risk of metastasis from a primary tumor cannot be predicted. Early diagnosis of individuals at high risk of developing metastases is clinically important and the identification of new biomarkers that are predictive of metastatic potential is of high value. Activation of TERT has been associated with a number of malignant tumors, including PC/PGL. However, the mechanism of TERT activation in the majority of PC/PGL remains unclear. As TERT promoter mutations occur rarely in PC/PGL, we hypothesized that other mechanisms - such as structural variations - may underlie TERT activation in these tumors. From 35 PC and four PGL, we identified three primary PCs that developed metastases with elevated TERT expression, each of which lacked TERT promoter mutations and promoter DNA methylation. Using whole genome sequencing, we identified somatic structural alterations proximal to the TERT locus in two of these tumors. In both tumors, the genomic rearrangements led to the positioning of super-enhancers proximal to the TERT promoter, that are likely responsible for the activation of the normally tightly repressed TERT expression in chromaffin cells

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available