4.1 Review

Experimental models of endocrine responsive breast cancer: strengths, limitations, and use

Journal

CANCER DRUG RESISTANCE
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 762-783

Publisher

OAE PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2021.33

Keywords

Breast cancer; experimental models; PDX; xenografts; study design

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program [CA171885]
  2. National Cancer Institute [U01CA184902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the relatively limited number of experimental models of ER+ breast cancer, they have been proven to be very useful in advancing understanding of how cells respond to endocrine therapies and the role of ER as a transcription factor. These models, despite their limitations, play a crucial role in studying mechanisms of therapy action and resistance and hypothesis testing in breast cancer research.
Breast cancers characterized by expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER; ESR1) represent approximately 70% of all new cases and comprise the largest molecular subtype of this disease. Despite this high prevalence, the number of adequate experimental models of ER+ breast cancer is relatively limited. Nonetheless, these models have proved very useful in advancing understanding of how cells respond to and resist endocrine therapies, and how the ER acts as a transcription factor to regulate cell fate signaling. We discuss the primary experimental models of ER+ breast cancer including 2D and 3D cultures of established cell lines, cell line- and patient-derived xenografts, and chemically induced rodent models, with a consideration of their respective general strengths and limitations. What can and cannot be learned easily from these models is also discussed, and some observations on how these models may be used more effectively are provided. Overall, despite their limitations, the panel of models currently available has enabled major advances in the field, and these models remain central to the ability to study mechanisms of therapy action and resistance and for hypothesis testing that would otherwise be intractable or unethical in human subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available