4.6 Article

A Harmful-Intrusion Detection Method Based on Background Reconstruction and Two-Dimensional K-S Test in an Optical Fiber Pre-Warning System

Journal

PHOTONIC SENSORS
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 143-152

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13320-016-0308-x

Keywords

Optical fiber intrusion pre-warning; extraction of harmful-intrusion signals; two-dimensional K-S test

Funding

  1. Scientific Pre-research Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571014]
  3. Scientific Pre-research Foundation of NCUT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The key technology and main difficulty for optical fiber intrusion pre-warning systems (OFIPS) is the extraction of harmful-intrusion signals. After being processed by a phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometer (F-OTDR), vibration signals can be preliminarily extracted. Generally, these include noises and intrusions. Here, intrusions can be divided into harmful and harmless intrusions. With respect to the close study of signal characteristics, an effective extraction method of harmful intrusion is proposed in the paper. Firstly, in the part of the background reconstruction, all intrusion signals are first detected by a constant false alarm rate (CFAR). We then reconstruct the backgrounds by extracting two-part information of alarm points, time and amplitude. This ensures that the detection background consists of intrusion signals. Secondly, in the part of the two-dimensional Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test, in order to extract harmful ones from all extracted intrusions, we design a separation method. It is based on the signal characteristics of harmful intrusion, which are shorter time interval and higher amplitude. In the actual OFIPS, the detection method is used in some typical scenes, which includes a lot of harmless intrusions, for example construction sites and busy roads. Results show that we can effectively extract harmful intrusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available