4.5 Article

Effect of cooking and preservation on nutritional and phytochemical composition of the mushroom Amanita zambiana

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 538-544

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.428

Keywords

Amanita zambiana; cooking; mushroom; nutrition; preservation

Funding

  1. Fogarty International Center Training [MTRCBSA 2D43TW001587-10A2]
  2. University of Zimbabwe Research Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of different cooking and preservation methods on the nutritional and phytochemical composition of the mushroom, Amanita zambiana, was investigated. Fresh mushrooms were boiled in water, fried, or microwaved. In addition, fresh mushrooms were either air-dried for 7 days or frozen at -20 degrees C for 14 days. The protein, lipid, carbohydrate, and phenolic content of the treated mushrooms were measured and compared to the fresh mushroom contents. Frying increased the protein (2.01% +/- 0.2% [ fresh mushroom] to 2.23%+/- 0.09%), lipid (14.68%+/- 0.9% to 15.56% +/- 0.34%), and carbohydrate (0.89% +/- 0.01% to 2.69% +/- 0.03%) content, while microwaving increased the protein (2.01% +/- 0.2% to 3.64% +/- 0.08%) and carbohydrate content (0.89% +/- 0.01% to 2.26%+/- 0.09%). Boiling only increased the carbohydrate content (0.89% +/- 0.01% to 1.71% +/- 0.05%) of the mushroom and significantly decreased (p <.05) the phenolic content (8.77 +/- 0.1 to 1.46 +/- 0.2 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/gmushroom). Drying resulted in significant increase (p <.05) in protein (2.01 +/- 0.2% to 24.36 +/- 0.09%), carbohydrate (0.89%+/- 0.01% to 58.67%+/- 3.29%), and phenolic contents (8.77 +/- 0.1 to 119.8 +/- 0.7 mg GAE/g mushroom), while freezing only increased the carbohydrate content (0.89%+/- 0.01% to 1.77% +/- 0.03%). From the three cooking methods studied, frying is recommended as the most effective cooking procedure in retaining or enhancing the mushroom nutrients, while drying is a better preservation method than freezing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available