3.8 Proceedings Paper

EXAMINATION OF RESONANT FREQUENCIES GENERATED BY COMBUSTION OSCILLATION IN A COMBUSTOR FUELED BY A HYDROGEN-NATURAL GAS MIXTURE AND AN UPSTREAM PIPE

Publisher

AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS

Keywords

Combustion oscillation; Acoustic impedance; Combustor model; Oscillation frequency; Temperature distribution; Hydrogen; Transfer matrix

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19K14919]
  2. Ono Charitable Trust for Acoustics
  3. Paloma Environmental Technology Development Foundation Research Grant
  4. KEIRIN RACE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental and modeling analysis successfully predicted the combustion oscillation frequency under the 100% natural gas condition, but failed to accurately predict the frequency under the hydrogen-natural gas condition.
A combustion oscillation experiment showed combustion oscillation frequencies of around 350 Hz when only natural gas was used as fuel and approximately 200 and 400 Hz when a hydrogen-natural gas mixture was used. To analyze the resonant frequency, two- and four-region models considering unburned and burned regions of the combustor were developed. The experimental frequencies of the 100% natural gas condition were successfully predicted. Conversely, the experimentally observed frequencies under the hydrogen-natural gas condition were not accurately predicted. A swirler-combustor model was then constructed to get closer to the actual configuration and shape of the experimental setup. However, the model could not reproduce the experimental value under the hydrogen-natural gas condition. A whole piping model was then developed by adding a casing and an air supply pipe to the combustor. The resonant frequencies under both the 100% natural gas and hydrogen-natural gas conditions were successfully calculated. The model reproduced the range and change tendency of the experimentally measured oscillation frequency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available