Journal
ANADOLU ARASTIRMALARI-ANATOLIAN RESEARCH
Volume -, Issue 24, Pages 33-66Publisher
ISTANBUL UNIV
DOI: 10.26650/anar.2021.24.914913
Keywords
Prehistory; Construction Material; Mudbrick; Micromorphology; Nitrogen
Categories
Funding
- American Research Institute in Turkey
- University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (RCAC)
- National Science Foundation [BCS-09121418]
- GermanAcademic Exchange Service (DAAD)
- Ludwig Maximilian University [BCS-09121418]
- [6647]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Animal dung is an important research area in archaeology, providing insights into past community life and human-animal interactions. By using different analytical methods, markers of dung can be identified in archaeological construction materials, showing changes in the use of animal dung over time and space.
Dung is one of the most important research areas of interdisciplinary studies, which can provide insights into the lives of past communities, environmental conditions, and human-animal interactions. In archaeological contexts, animal dung cannot be identified macroscopically in most cases. Hence, new methods and approaches focusing on ways to describe the micro-markers of dung have increased and diversified over the last decade. This study used a multi-proxy approach focusing on analytical methods to identify the markers of animal dung in prehistoric construction materials. Micromorphology/thin section analysis, and calciumv carbonate (CaCO3), carbon (C), and nitrogen (N) analyses were carried out on mudbricks and mortar from the Aceramic Neolithic site of Asikli Hoyuk. Thin section analysis suggested that fecal spherulites are one of the most important proxies of archaeological dung. Nitrogen is the other indicator of animal dung. The results showed that the Asikli inhabitants did not abandon mudbricks in their architectural needs for decades and used animal dung as a temper in mudbricks and mortar. Throughout the centuries of occupation at the site, the use of animal dung as a temper changed both diachronically and spatially, particularly with the establishment of settled village life at Asikli Hoyuk. In conclusion, this study suggests that the limits of knowledge of archaeological dung can be expanded using a multi-proxy methodological approach.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available