4.2 Review

Depenalization, diversion and decriminalization: A realist review and programme theory of alternatives to criminalization for simple drug possession

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 29-54

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1477370819887514

Keywords

Drugs; depenalization; diversion; decriminalization; realist review; programme theory

Funding

  1. Department of Justice and Equality
  2. Department of Health of the Republic of Ireland
  3. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre at the University of New South Wales - Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Policy makers are increasingly interested in alternatives to criminalization for the possession of illicit drugs, but there is currently no theoretically based and empirically tested framework to guide development and evaluation. This article presents a realist programme theory of alternative measures, based on a review of literature from nine countries. The study shows how different measures interact with social conditions and institutional contexts, triggering mechanisms across three causal pathways. It concludes that specific combinations of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes can reduce harms without increasing drug use or related health and crime harms.
Alternatives to criminalization for the simple possession of illicit drugs are increasingly of interest to policy makers. But there is no existing theoretically based, empirically tested framework that can inform development and evaluation. This article presents a realist programme theory of such alternatives. It bases this on a realist review, which followed the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES). It describes the systematic process of searching the literature in English on nine relevant countries (Australia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Jamaica, Netherland, Portugal, the UK, the USA) for information on alternative measures in three categories: depenalization; diversion; and decriminalization. It shows how these measures - in theory and in practice - combine with pre-existing social conditions and institutional contexts to trigger mechanisms across three causal pathways (normative; criminal justice; and health and social services). It shows how some posited causal processes are more empirically supported than others. Alternative measures can reduce harms imposed by criminal justice processes without increasing drug use or related health and crime harms, but this depends on specific combinations of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available