4.5 Article

Vocabulary learning through videos: captions, advance-organizer strategy, and their combination

Journal

COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 518-550

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1720253

Keywords

Advance-organizer strategy; captions; glossed full captions; vocabulary learning; vocabulary knowledge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that among 240 Chinese ESL primary school students, captioned videos significantly influenced vocabulary learning, with glossed full captions being the most effective caption type. The use of an advance-organizer strategy resulted in better learning outcomes in terms of vocabulary form, meaning, and use, with the combination of this strategy and glossed full captions leading to the best performance in each dimension of vocabulary knowledge.
This study intended to examine L2 young learners' vocabulary learning (i.e. form, meaning, and use). The research design involved a 2 (advance-organizer strategy: present vs. absent) x 4 (caption type: glossed full captions, glossed keyword captions, full captions, keyword captions) between-subjects design. A total of 240 Chinese ESL primary school students were recruited and randomly and equally assigned to eight conditions. Findings revealed that captioned videos produced significant effects on learning regarding the three dimensions of vocabulary knowledge. Glossed full captions were found to be the most effective caption type. Administration of the advance-organizer strategy also resulted in better gains in learning form, meaning, and use than the absence of this strategy. The combination of the advance-organizer strategy and glossed full captions led to the best learning performance for each dimension of vocabulary knowledge. Relevant pedagogical implications, including use of the advance-organizer strategy and captions, are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available