4.4 Article

'We teach, we record, we edit, and we reflect': Engaging pre-service language teachers in video-based reflective practice

Journal

LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 552-571

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1362168820906281

Keywords

pre-service language teachers; reflective learning; video-based reflection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The significance of reflective practice in education, especially in language education, has been widely recognized. Video-based reflective practice has been shown to be a powerful tool for enhancing student teachers' teaching skills. However, there is a lack of research on the complex interplay between the process of reflective practice and the contextual factors in student teachers' learning environment.
The significance of reflective practice (RP) has been widely recognized in both general education and language education. The past years have witnessed an exponential growth of studies in examining how technology can be utilized to promote teachers' RP and video-based RP has been extensively reported as a powerful tool for teacher learning in many educational contexts. While existing literature has documented the potential benefits that student teachers may reap from video-based RP, there is a lack of attention to the complex interplay between the process of their RP and the contextual factors in their situated learning environment. This article reports on a study which aims to promote video-based RP among student teachers in a pre-service language teacher education course in Hong Kong. Drawing on data from post-course interviews with and the videoed reflection of six student teachers, the study uncovered the complex and dynamic process of the student teachers' video-based RP. This article offers practical implications for language teachers, teacher educators and school leaders on how to promote RP in second language teacher education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available