3.8 Article

Personalizing the war: Perspectives for the adoption of news recommendation algorithms in the media coverage of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine

Journal

MEDIA WAR AND CONFLICT
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 25-45

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1750635220906254

Keywords

conflict coverage; digital news; news personalization; Russia; Ukraine; algorithms

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council [638514]
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [400.17.605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of algorithmically tailored individual news feeds is seen as an important strategy for legacy media to meet consumers' information needs. However, this personalization of news distribution raises concerns about the societal function of legacy media, especially when dealing with traumatic and divisive content. This article provides a conceptual assessment of adopting personalization for conflict coverage in Ukraine and Russia, where press freedom is limited.
The use of algorithmically tailored individual news feeds is increasingly viewed as an important strategy for accommodating consumers' information needs by legacy media. However, growing personalization of news distribution also raises normative concerns about the societal function of legacy media, in particular when dealing with personalization of traumatic and polarizing content. To extend the discussion of these concerns beyond the current focus on the role of news personalization in Western democracies, this article offers a conceptual assessment of perspectives for adopting personalization for conflict coverage in Ukraine and Russia, where media systems enjoy a lesser degree of press freedom. Using the coverage of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine as a case study, the article offers a conceptual framework for assessing the impact of personalization on the distribution of conflict-related news in a non-Western context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available