4.6 Article

Contextual resource or demand? The effects of organizational engagement climate on employees' work-to-family conflict

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 1868-1880

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-020-00689-1

Keywords

Organizational Engagement Climate; Work-to-Family Conflict; Work Engagement; Supervisory Support; the Work-Home Resources Model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71422014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of organizational engagement climate on employees' work-to-family conflict by examining resource generation and resource depletion mechanisms. Using a sample of 2415 employees from 280 Chinese organizations, the results showed that organizational engagement climate was negatively related to work-to-family conflict through work engagement, while positively related to work-to-family conflict through work time. Additionally, the findings suggested that high levels of supervisory support strengthened the relationship between organizational engagement climate and work engagement.
Drawing from the work-home resources model and the social support literature, the present study investigated how organizational engagement climate influences employees' work-to-family conflict by examining resource generation and resource depletion mechanisms. Using a sample comprised of 2415 employees from 280 Chinese organizations, we found that organizational engagement climate was negatively related to employees' work-to-family conflict via work engagement, and simultaneously, positively related to employees' work-to-family conflict via work time. Additionally, our findings suggested that high level of supervisory support strengthened the organizational engagement climate-work engagement relationship. We discussed the theoretical and practical implications, as well as the limitations and suggestions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available