4.1 Article

Are children with disabilities in school and learning? Evidence from a household survey in rural Punjab, Pakistan

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2020.1749993

Keywords

Learning outcomes; household survey; Pakistan; disability; Washington Group; primary education

Funding

  1. ESRC-DFID Raising Learning Outcomes grant [ES/M005445/1]
  2. ESRC [ES/M005445/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the invisibility of children with disabilities in educational data and presents findings from a household survey conducted in rural Punjab, Pakistan. The research reveals that many of these children are enrolled in mainstream schools, although their chances of attending school are lower compared to their peers. Additionally, the overall literacy and numeracy levels are low, especially for children with disabilities. These findings provide important policy lessons applicable to other low-income contexts.
Invisibility of children with disabilities in data on educational access and learning is a key policy challenge for tracking progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. In this article, we report findings from a household survey undertaken in rural Punjab, Pakistan. These data enable us to identify the extent to which children with disabilities are in school and learning the basics in literacy and numeracy. We find that, perhaps contrary to expectations, many of these children in this context are in mainstream (government and private) schools, although their chances of being in school are lower than their peers. We further find that overall levels of literacy and numeracy are low, even more so for children with disabilities. Our findings corroborate recent research from other countries. The paper highlights important lessons for the policy which are of relevance to other low-income contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available