4.1 Article

Environmental Conservation or the Treadmill of Law: A Case Study of the Post-2014 Husbandry Waste Regulations in China

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X20928024

Keywords

husbandry waste control; agro-industrialization; treadmill of production; treadmill of law; China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the formulation and implementation of national environmental regulations in China from 2014 to 2019 and finds that conflicting interpretations of the policies resulted from the different jurisdictions. The study argues that these regulations are not only aimed at reducing environmental pollution caused by animal husbandry expansion, but also serve as state-led rural development initiatives aiming to reconfigure land use and promote agricultural structural adjustment.
As industrialized animal agriculture expanded rapidly in the last decade, the resultant pollution has generated widespread despoliation of natural resources and environmental victimization in rural China. This study examines the formulation and implementation of national environmental regulations from 2014 to 2019 and finds that the juxtaposing ministerial and provincial jurisdictions resulted in conflicting interpretations of the scale and evaluation criteria of the national policy. We argue that the regulations are more than centralized conservation programs designed to reduce environmental pollution caused by the expansion of animal husbandry. Instead, these regulations are fundamentally state-led rural development initiatives that utilize the designations of ecological protection zones to reconfigure land use and promote scale-up production in agricultural structural adjustment initiatives. The enforcement of these environmental regulations, therefore, constitutes a treadmill of law (ToL) that accelerated the geographical specialization and function intensification of the Chinese husbandry sector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available