4.1 Article

Impact of Cell Density on Differentiation Efficiency of Rat Adipose-derived Stem Cells into Schwann-like Cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM CELLS
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 213-220

Publisher

KOREAN SOC STEM CELL RESEARCH
DOI: 10.15283/ijsc16031

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives: Schwann-like (SC-like) cells induced from adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) may be one of the ideal alternative cell sources for obtaining Schwann cells (SCs). They can be used for treating peripheral nerve injuries. Co-culture with SCs or exposure to glial growth factors are commonly used for differentiation of ASCs to SC-like cells. However, the effect of initial cell density as an inductive factor on the differentiation potential of ASCs into the SC-like cells has not been yet investigated. Methods and Results: ASCs were harvested from rat and characterized. The cells were seeded into the culture flasks at three different initial cell densities i.e. 2x10(3), 4x10(3) and 8x10(3) cells/cm(2) an overnight and differentiated toward SC-like cells using glial growth factors. After two weeks, the differentiation rate of ASCs to SC-like cells at different densities was assessed by immunofluorescence, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and real time RT-PCR. Expression of the typical SCs markers, S-100 proteins and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) protein, was observed in all cell densities groups although the number of S100-positive and GFAP-positive cells, and the expression of p75(NTR) mRNA, another SC marker, were significantly higher at the density of 8x10(3) cells/cm(2) when compared with the other cell densities groups (p<0.001). Conclusions: The results suggest that the higher differentiation rate of ASCs to SC-like cells can be obtained at initial cell density of 8x10(3) cells/cm(2), possibly via increased cell-cell interaction and cell density-dependent influence of glial growth factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available