The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York

Platform companies like Uber not only disrupt existing markets but also contest existing regulatory regimes. This raises the question of how, when, and why such companies are regulated. This article develops, tests, and defends a theoretical framework that explains the politics of regulatory response to the rise of platform capitalism. Using discourse network analysis and a case study on the regulation of Uber in New York, it shows that the success or failure of regulations depends on the ability of actors to mobilize broad coalition; that narratives affect the composition of these coalitions; and that platform companies have both unique political strengths and vulnerabilities. This article makes substantive contributions to our understanding of the politics of platform capitalism, and it makes theoretical contributions to the literature studies on coalitional politics, ideational institutionalism, and business power.

Automated summary

This article examines the politics of regulatory response to platform companies and presents a theoretical framework that explains the reasons and outcomes of regulations. Through a case study on the regulation of Uber in New York, it finds that the success of regulations depends on the ability of actors to form broad coalitions, and narratives influence the composition of these coalitions.