4.3 Article

Job demands amid work intensity: British Columbia school administrators' perceptions

Journal

EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & LEADERSHIP
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 1013-1031

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1741143220957331

Keywords

Principals and vice-principals; job demands; job challenges; job hindrances

Funding

  1. UBC Hampton Junior Award [F14-03567]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This qualitative study examines how job demands are manifested in intensified work conditions among school administrators and how their perceptions of job demands contribute to their sense of control. The results indicate that job challenges are temporary and easily overcome, while job hindrances are more institutional and difficult to overcome. Treating job challenges and hindrances similarly may increase work-related stress among school principals.
Job demands overburden school administrators' personal and professional capacity and affect their performance and well-being. However, studies on principals and vice-principals' work intensification fail to highlight how their work demands and challenges are manifested, and how work demands contribute to the changing nature of their work. This qualitative study explores in what ways job demands are manifested in school administers' intensified work conditions and how their perceptions of job demands help them create a sense of control. The study utilizes the job demands model as a framework to help closely examine two types of job demands: job challenges; and job hindrances though principals' accounts. The results show that job challenges tend to be transitory and are more likely to be overcome; job hindrances however tend to be more institutional and less temporary and harder to overcome. Attempting to deal with job challenges the same as dealing with job hindrances may become challenging itself and build up rather than alleviate work-related stress among school principals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available