4.3 Article

Perceptions of the Fourth Agricultural Revolution: What's In, What's Out, and What Consequences are Anticipated?

Journal

SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 162-189

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/soru.12324

Keywords

adaptive capacity; agriculture 4; 0; artificial intelligence; automation; data analytics; gene editing; fourth agricultural revolution; responsible innovation; robotics; technology

Funding

  1. University of East Anglia
  2. Elizabeth Creak Charitable Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the association of technologies with the fourth agricultural revolution and investigates the perception and anticipated impacts of this revolution. The findings reveal that emergent, game-changing technologies are associated with the fourth agricultural revolution in media and policy documents. The benefits to productivity and the environment were prioritized, with less attention given to social consequences. However, the impacts were overwhelmingly presented positively, despite the fact that technologies also bring negative consequences.
Technological advancement is seen as one way of sustainably intensifying agriculture. Scholars argue that innovation needs to be responsible, but it is difficult to anticipate the consequences of the 'fourth agricultural revolution' without a clear sense of which technologies are included and excluded. The major aims of this article were to investigate which technologies are being associated with the fourth agricultural revolution, as well as to understand how this revolution is being perceived, whether positive or negative consequences are given equal attention, and what type of impacts are anticipated. To this end, we undertook a content analysis of UK media and policy documents alongside interviews of farmers and advisers. We found that the fourth agricultural revolution is associated with emergent, game-changing technologies, at least in media and policy documents. In these sources, the benefits to productivity and the environment were prioritised with less attention to social consequences, but impacts were overwhelmingly presented positively. Farmers and advisers experienced many benefits of technologies and some predicted higher-tech futures. It was clear, however, that technologies create a number of negative consequences. We reflect on these findings and provide advice to policy-makers about how to interrogate the benefits, opportunities, and risks afforded by agricultural technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available