Journal
JOURNALISM
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 736-754Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1464884920959552
Keywords
Bourdieu; citation analysis; journalism; scholarship; systematic review
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Journalism scholarship draws on theories from other disciplines, with the field theory by Pierre Bourdieu gaining immense popularity. However, the systematic analysis of 249 articles reveals a selective in-depth use of field theory, ambiguity in the appropriation of concepts, and the dominance of Western scholarship in shaping Bourdieusian thought in journalism research.
Like many fields of communication research, journalism scholarship draws on theories from other disciplines and mostly applies social theories to make sense of journalistic practices. One theory that has gained immense popularity in recent years is Pierre Bourdieu's field theory. However, while there are now numerous studies using his concepts, we have little comprehensive understanding of how scholarship applies them. To this end, this study conducts a systematic analysis of 249 articles, using content analysis, textual analysis and citation analysis to examine how field theory is adopted and adapted, as well as who has interpretative authority in shaping Bourdieusian thought in journalism research. The findings suggest a selective in-depth use of field theory and that the appropriation of some concepts is still ambiguous. Moreover, it highlights once more the dominance of Western scholarship in the academic field.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available