4.4 Review

Trends of Positive Youth Development Publications (1995-2020): A Scientometric Review

Journal

APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 421-446

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11482-020-09878-3

Keywords

Scientometric analysis; Positive youth development; PYD; CiteSpace; Knowledge mapping

Funding

  1. the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics [330600004007000006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study collected and analyzed 1435 academic works on positive youth development (PYD) using CiteSpace. The results show that authors and institutions in Western societies are the main contributors to PYD research and interdisciplinary collaboration is growing. Research hotspots were identified using document co-citation analysis and research frontiers and trendy topics in PYD were found using burst detection.
In recent decades, the positive youth development approach has gained momentum among researchers and practitioners who focus on youth potential and adolescent well-being. In this study, 1435 academic works on positive youth development (PYD) are collected from the Web of Science using CiteSpace, reviewed and analyzed. First, the number, subject distribution, country, and institution of published papers are presented, and the author collaboration network involved in PYD is analyzed using network analysis. The results show that authors and institutions in Western societies are the main contributors to PYD research and that interdisciplinary collaboration is gradually growing. Using document co-citation analysis, research hotspots in the field were investigated. Furthermore, the research frontiers and trendy topics in PYD from 2010 to 2019 were found by using burst detection, and research gaps were identified. The findings provide research directions for future PYD studies in the field of applied quality of life research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available