4.2 Review

Empathy Measurement in Autistic and Nonautistic Adults: A COSMIN Systematic Literature Review

Journal

ASSESSMENT
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 332-350

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1073191120964564

Keywords

autism; empathy; empathy quotient; empathy measurement; self-report; COSMIN; validity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Empathy is crucial for social functioning and its relevance to clinical conditions is significant. This review examines the empirical evidence supporting self-report measures of empathy used with autistic and nonautistic adults. The study identifies 19 measures, of which five showed insufficient properties and cannot be recommended. The other 14 measures had notable gaps in evidence and require further evaluation. Additionally, the study highlights the need for tests of measurement invariance and differential item functioning to understand group differences in empathy.
Empathy is essential for social functioning and is relevant to a host of clinical conditions. This COSMIN review evaluated the empirical support for empathy self-report measures used with autistic and nonautistic adults. Given autism is characterized by social differences, it is the subject of a substantial proportion of empathy research. Therefore, this review uses autism as a lens through which to scrutinize the psychometric quality of empathy measures. Of the 19 measures identified, five demonstrated High-Quality evidence for Insufficient properties and cannot be recommended. The remaining 14 had noteworthy gaps in evidence and require further evaluation before use with either group. Without tests of measurement invariance or differential item functioning, the extent to which observed group differences represent actual trait differences remains unknown. Using autism as a test case highlights an alarming tendency for empathy measures to be used to characterize, and potentially malign vulnerable populations before sufficient validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available