4.2 Article

Queer in the Heartland: Cancer Risks, Screenings, and Diagnoses among Sexual and Gender Minorities in Iowa

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 428-444

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1826832

Keywords

Gay; lesbian; transgender; queer; mammogram; Papanicolaou (Pap) test; colonoscopy; cancer; Midwestern United States

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002537]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the cancer experiences of sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in Iowa, a predominantly rural Midwestern state. Results showed that skin cancer was the most commonly reported cancer, and there was a lack of colorectal cancer screenings among older respondents. Additionally, differences were observed in mammograms, HPV vaccination, and heavy drinking based on gender and sexual orientation.
Little is known about the cancer experiences of sexual and gender minority (SGM) persons in Midwestern areas. In response, a statewide survey of 567 SGM adults in Iowa, a largely rural Midwestern state, assessed cancer prevalence, screening tests, and related risk factors. Skin cancer accounted for nearly half of reported cancers. Individuals assigned female sex at birth reported high levels of lifetime mammograms and Papanicolaou (Pap) tests. In contrast, there were almost no colorectal cancer screenings reported among older (age 50+) respondents, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation. Current tobacco use was modest overall, and cisgender women were more likely to report heavy drinking than cisgender men. Cisgender men age 40 and younger were less likely to have any human papillomavirus vaccination than cisgender women. The survey identified both strengths to leverage and deficits to address, which may inform future cancer prevention efforts in Iowa and other Midwestern states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available