4.2 Article

Masculinity and Suicide in Bangladesh

Journal

OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages 218-240

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0030222820966239

Keywords

suicide; hegemonic masculinity; crisis; gender roles; Bangladesh

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the association between masculinities and suicide in Bangladesh, which is a serious but under-researched public health problem. The study found that male suicide can be attributed to men's inability to fulfill societal expectations of being financially provider and meeting their partners' sexual needs, as well as their loss of self-respect and respect from others. Some participants mentioned self-sacrifice and mental/physical illnesses as reasons for male suicide. The findings suggest that addressing socio-cultural and religious issues related to men's troubles and changing restrictive gender roles and masculinity ideals can help prevent suicide.
Suicide is a serious but under-researched public health problem in Bangladesh. In light of this, we sought to explore the association between masculinities and suicide. We interviewed 20 family members/friends of men who died by suicide across 12 rural areas of the Jhenaidah district, Bangladesh. We found that male suicide was attributed to men's inability to fulfil hegemonic masculine demands such as financial provision and meeting the sexual needs of their spouses. Suicide was also linked to men's loss of self-respect and respect from others. Some participants mentioned that men committed suicide as an act of self-sacrifice, while others cited mental and physical illness. As a result of these findings, we propose that addressing socio-cultural and religious issues associated with men's troubles may help to prevent suicide. At the same time, changing the restrictive gender roles and masculinity-related ideals is also needed to counter the problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available