4.3 Article

The spiralling of the securitisation of migration in the EU: from the management of a 'crisis' to a governance of human mobility?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 1327-1344

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851464

Keywords

Migration; securitisation; state actors; non-state actors; practices; narratives

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This special issue highlights that the process of securitising migration is not linear but a spiralling phenomenon involving different actors and their policies, practices, and narratives. By categorising cognitions, mandates, constituencies, and interests of state and non-state actors, it becomes possible to understand why and how migration is constructed or deconstructed as a threat. Prejudicial cognitions are identified as a key factor contributing to the securitisation of migration and the reinforcement of its nexus with crime. The contributions in this special issue provide evidence through various analyses of migration management at different levels, both governmental and non-governmental.
This special issue illustrates that the securitisation of migration is not a linear process but a spiralling phenomenon, which involves different actors, and their policies, practices and narratives, in a spiralling progression that both self-fulfils and reinforces migration-security nexus' dynamics. By proposing a cognitive ontology to understand the social construction of migration as a security threat, the introduction to this special issue proposes a categorisation of cognitions, mandates, constituencies and interests of state and non-state actors. Through a dichotomisation of these categories, it is possible to clarify how and why they either socially construct or deconstruct migration as a threat. In particular, the special issue identifies in prejudicial cognitions one of the main reasons for which a variety of actors enact practices and produce narratives that contribute to both securitising migration and reinforcing its nexus with crime, and the consequent social construction of 'migration crises'. The different contributions to this special issue prove the arguments here exposed with a different analysis of how migration has been dealt with at either governmental or non-governmental levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available