4.4 Article

A strengths-based approach to chronic pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 400-408

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2020.1858337

Keywords

Character strengths; chronic pain; pain self-efficacy; strength-based approach

Funding

  1. VIA Institute on Character

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonpharmacological approaches to chronic pain are increasingly popular among therapists and health-care providers. This study examined a strengths-based approach to reduce chronic pain and enhance pain self-efficacy. The findings indicated that focusing on the strength of zest effectively increased pain self-efficacy and the capacity to function despite pain.
Nonpharmacological approaches to chronic pain are being increasingly sought out by therapists and health-care providers. Cognitive approaches to reduce pain catastrophizing have shown some efficacy; however, interventions used to increase well-being have not been investigated. In this study, we examined a strengths-based approach to reduce chronic pain and enhance pain self-efficacy, the belief that one has the capacity to function despite pain. In study 1, we administered a survey (N = 491) in order to identify the strengths most associated with pain self-efficacy. In study 2, participants (N = 122) were randomized into one of four experimental conditions based on the findings of Study 1, including a group who wrote about zest as well as several comparison groups. Results from Study 2 indicated that zest remained the most promising strength to target. In Study 3 (N = 81), in a pre-registered trial, we replicated the main findings of Study 2, showing that focusing on the strength of zest effectively increases pain self-efficacy as well as the capacity to function despite pain after a two-week follow-up. These studies show that a strength-based intervention can increase pain self-efficacy and the capacity to function despite pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available