4.6 Article

The effect of Rugby World Cup 2019 on residents' psychological well-being: a mediating role of psychological capital

Journal

CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 692-706

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1857713

Keywords

Mega events; event impact; residents; well-being; psychological capital

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JSPS KAKENHI] [20K19492]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K19492] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the relationships between residents' impact perception of the 2019 Rugby World Cup, psychological capital, and psychological well-being. The results showed that residents' perceptions of event impacts were positively associated with psychological capital, which had a long-term impact on psychological well-being. Cultural interests and community pride were particularly influential in enhancing residents' psychological well-being.
The current study aimed to examine the relationships among residents' impact perception of 2019 Rugby World Cup (i.e. economic impact, cultural interests and new opportunity, community pride, and environmental impact), psychological capital (i.e. hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and resilience), and psychological well-being. The two-wave time-lagged data were collected from residents in the host cities (a following week of the event and eight weeks after the event; N = 206). The results indicated that residents' perceptions of event impacts were positively associated with psychological capital, which influenced psychological well-being over time. Cultural interests and community pride were considered particularly influential in enhancing residents' psychological well-being. The findings are useful for policy makers, planning to utilize mega events to boost residents' psychological well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available