3.8 Review

Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Properties of Muscle, Bone, and Brain Function in Older Adults: A Narrative Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 318-335

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19390211.2021.1877232

Keywords

Dosage; strength; fatigue; function; cognition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aging is associated with declines in muscle, bone, and brain health, which can be impacted by lifestyle factors such as exercise. Despite the benefits of exercise, a majority of older adults do not meet recommended levels of resistance and aerobic training, highlighting the need to explore other lifestyle interventions for maintaining health in older age.
Aging is associated with reductions in muscle and bone mass and brain function, which may be counteracted by several lifestyle factors, of which exercise appears to be most beneficial. However, less than 20% of older adults (> 55 years of age) adhere to performing the recommended amount of resistance training (>= 2 days/week) and less than 12% regularly meet the aerobic exercise guidelines (>= 150 min/week of moderate to vigorous intensity aerobic exercise) required to achieve significant health benefits. Therefore, from a healthy aging and clinical perspective, it is important to determine whether other lifestyle interventions (independent of exercise) can have beneficial effects on aging muscle quality and quantity, bone strength, and brain function. Creatine, a nitrogen containing organic compound found in all cells of the body, has the potential to have favorable effects on muscle, bone, and brain health (independent of exercise) in older adults. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine and summarize the small body of research investigating the effects of creatine supplementation alone on measures of muscle mass and performance, bone mineral and strength, and indices of brain health in older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available