4.2 Article

Emotion Regulation as a Transdiagnostic Risk Factor for (Non)Clinical Adolescents' Internalizing and Externalizing Psychopathology: Investigating the Intervening Role of Psychological Need Experiences

Journal

CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 124-136

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-020-01107-0

Keywords

Emotion regulation; Basic Psychological Needs; Self-Determination Theory; Psychological well-being; Adolescence

Funding

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders [FWO.3EO.2015.0012.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that dysfunctional emotion regulation was positively linked to internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescents, and need frustration partially mediated the relationship between emotion regulation and psychopathology. These findings suggest that both emotion regulation and basic psychological needs may play a transdiagnostic role in adolescents' internalizing and externalizing symptoms.
This study investigated emotion regulation (i.e., emotional integration, suppression and dysregulation) as a transdiagnostic process underlying adolescents' internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Basic psychological need experiences were investigated as a possible underlying mechanism explaining this association. A heterogeneous sample of non-clinical and clinically-referred adolescents reported upon emotion regulation, basic psychological needs (i.e., need satisfaction and frustration), and both internalizing and externalizing problems. Results indicated that dysfunctional emotion regulation was positively linked to internalizing as well as externalizing problems. Need frustration was a partial mediator in this relation between emotion regulation and psychopathology. The findings suggest that both emotion regulation and basic psychological needs may play a transdiagnostic role in adolescents' internalizing and externalizing symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available