Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years
David P. Taggart et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2019)
Five-year costs from a randomised comparison of bilateral and single internal thoracic artery grafts
Matthew Little et al.
HEART (2019)
Longitudinal medical resources and costs among type 2 diabetes patients participating in the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS)
Shelby D. Reed et al.
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM (2018)
Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery
Mario Gaudino et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Sensitivity Analysis for Not-at-Random Missing Data in Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Tutorial
Baptiste Leurent et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2018)
Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation
Michael Schomaker et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2018)
The ROMA trial: why it is needed
Mario F. L. Gaudino et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY (2018)
Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol
Mario Gaudino et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2017)
One-year costs of bilateral or single internal mammary grafts in the Arterial Revascularisation Trial
Alastair M. Gray et al.
HEART (2017)
Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis
Sana N. Buttar et al.
HEART (2017)
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts
David P. Taggart et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective
Ruben L. Osnabrugge et al.
HEART (2015)
Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data
Ian R. White et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Protocol for the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). A randomised trial to compare survival following bilateral versus single internal mammary grafting in coronary revascularisation [ISRCTN46552265]
DP Taggart et al.
TRIALS (2006)
Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility
A Manca et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2005)
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves - facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions
E Fenwick et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2004)
Performance of the WHO Rose angina questionnaire in post-menopausal women: Are all of the questions necessary?
DA Lawlor et al.
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2003)
Share Paper
