4.5 Review

A systematic review on shared mobility in China

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2021.1879974

Keywords

Governance; impact factor; low-carbon cities; shared mobility; transportation system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reviews the current state of shared mobility in China, analyzing the factors shaping shared mobility patterns from the perspectives of consumers, service providers, the government, and the environment. It also discusses governance measures guiding shared mobility and investigates the impact of shared mobility on a potential low-carbon transportation system transition.
The last decade witnessed a rapid rise in shared mobility in China. However, there is lack of understanding how the shared mobility market developed, how shared mobility reshapes daily travel patterns, and what shared mobility contributes, if at all, to environmental goals, and in particular climate change mitigation. Here, we systematically review the state of shared mobility in China, scoping 2541 English paper and 12,140 Chinese research papers. We differentiate between ride hailing, car sharing, and bike sharing and analyze the factors shaping shared mobility patterns from the four perspectives of consumers, service providers, the government, and the environment. We also elaborate on governance measures guiding shared mobility and investigate the impact of future shared mobility on a potential low-carbon transportation system transition, highlighting the key role of bike sharing and shared pooled mobility. We show that COVID-19 reduced demand for car hailing, but rendered bike sharing more popular. This work provides a systematic guidance for the future development of shared mobility, and its possibility to contribute to climate change mitigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available