4.2 Article

Mind wandering increases linearly with text difficulty

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages 284-293

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01483-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Behavioural Science Institute (Radboud University Nijmegen)
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [016-165-100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between text difficulty and mind wandering during reading is linear, contrary to the expected U-shaped pattern. Text interest moderates the effect of text difficulty on mind wandering. Furthermore, mind wandering is associated with poorer performance on comprehension tests.
Although mind wandering during reading is known to be affected by text difficulty, the nature of this relationship is not yet fully understood. To examine this issue, we conducted an experiment in which participants read non-fiction texts that varied along five levels of difficulty under naturalistic conditions. Difficulty levels were determined based on Flesch-Kincaid Grade Levels and verified with Coh-Metrix indices. Mind wandering was measured with thought probes. We predicted that text difficulty and mind wandering have a U-shaped (i.e., quadratic) relationship. Contrary to our expectations, but in line with some prior studies, mind wandering linearly increased with text difficulty. Additionally, text interest moderated the effect of text difficulty on mind wandering. Finally, mind wandering was associated with worse performance on a comprehension test. Together, our findings extend previous work by showing that (a) a linear relationship between difficulty and mind wandering exists during common page-by-page reading of pre-existing texts and that (b) this relationship holds across a broad range of difficulty levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available