Journal
ELECTRONIC MARKETS
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 1103-1118Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-021-00456-5
Keywords
Crowdfunding; Trust; Social trust; Success; Campaign; Design
Categories
Funding
- University of Agder
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Sharing campaign information via social media is positively associated with campaign success in both high and low social trust societies. Central route cues to persuasion are more prevalent in campaigns from low social trust societies, while some peripheral cues are more prevalent in campaigns from high social trust societies. There is partial support that central route cues are more important for campaign success in low social trust societies.
Trust is critical for successful participation in online marketplaces. In crowdfunding, fundraisers seek to win the trust of potential supporters towards contributing to their projects despite risks of non-delivery or deviations from campaign promises. This study explores how cultural differences in social trust proclivities influence reward crowdfunding campaign design and success. Specifically, we analyze data about 700 campaigns from a relatively high social trust society (HTS) - Finland, and 700 campaigns from a relatively low social trust society (LTS) - Poland. We find that sharing campaign information via social media is positively associated with campaign success in both contexts. Building on the Elaboration Likelihood Model, we show that central route cues to persuasion are more prevalent in campaigns from LTS vs. HTS, and that some peripheral cues are more prevalent in campaigns from HTS than LTS. Finally, we find partial support that central route cues are more important for campaign success in LTS.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available