4.3 Article

Enhancing student resilience by targeting staff resilience, attitudes and practices

Journal

HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 1013-1027

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2021.1877622

Keywords

Resilience; staff development; leadership; retention; employability

Funding

  1. Australian Technology Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research explores the impact of a staff leadership program on the conceptualisation of resilience and how it can influence student resilience through curricula and/or co-curricula innovation. The study found that the social cognition process of sensemaking is crucial for understanding resilience, and the program's political leadership strategies promoted changes in participants' teaching practices.
Resilience is a much-needed capability for both university staff and students in this volatile time. However, conceptualisations of resilience vary widely, with many viewing this as a fixed attribute each individual either has or doesn't have, and the impact of context on resilience is often neglected. This research explores the outcomes of a staff leadership program focused on participants' conceptualisation of resilience and how they can influence student resilience through curricula and/or co-curricula innovation. The program, informed by social cognition and political leadership theory, was delivered to 58 staff from a range of disciplines across three Australian universities. Several program attendees participated in a pre (N = 13) and/or post (N = 10) interview that examined their understanding of resilience and self-identified changes in their teaching practice in relation to resilience. The importance of the social cognition process of sensemaking (establishing a shared, contemporary view of resilience as a dynamic process through an ecological lens) appeared critical. The program's political leadership strategies promoted changes to participants' teaching practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available