4.5 Article

Power and conflict in inter-organisational information systems development

Journal

INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 440-468

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/isj.12335

Keywords

conflict; episodic power; qualitative case study; systemic power

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the dynamics of power and conflict in inter-organisational information systems development projects, highlighting how the organizational setup forms a foundational system from which specific power practices emerge. These power practices, such as hiding, storytelling, and bargaining, have both restrictive and productive effects on conflict, but they cannot easily escape the confines of the foundational system, leading to the resurfacing of different manifestations of latent conflict.
The need for inter-organisational information systems projects, which are complex undertakings often riddled with poorly understood power struggles and conflicts that hinder project success, has increased in previous decades. Through the lenses of systemic and episodic power, together with an organisational conflict model, this longitudinal, qualitative case study explores the dynamics of power and conflict and their effects in an inter-organisational information systems development project. This study highlights that the bureaucratic, social and technical setup of the project forms a foundational system from which specific power practices emerge, in this case, the practices of hiding, storytelling and bargaining. The power practices have both restrictive and productive effects on conflict, but the practices cannot easily escape the confines of the foundational system and continue to cause the resurfacing of different manifestations of latent conflict inherent in the system. As a result, both 'power to' (systemic power) and 'power over' (episodic power) can escalate project conflict, and rational conflict management for gaining 'win-win' resolutions may not be in the stakeholders' interests. Thus, strategies for openly managing political conflicts should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available