Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017)
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2020)
Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations
Marjan Bakker et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)
DOES PSYCHOLOGY HAVE A CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST PROBLEM?
Tom Chivers
NATURE (2019)
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
Brian A. Nosek et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2019)
Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application (2019)
Seven Easy Steps to Open Science An Annotated Reading List
Sophia Cruewell et al.
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
Open Science Practices in Clinical Psychology Journals: An Audit Study
Daria Nutu et al.
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
Psychology's Renaissance
Leif D. Nelson et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 69 (2018)
Research, regulatory, and clinical decision-making: the importance of scientific integrity
Joshua D. Wallach et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility
Victoria Stodden et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
The preregistration revolution
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine
Florian Naudet et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2018)
Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
David Moher et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2018)
Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine
Florian Naudet et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2018)
Improving Disclosure of Financial Conflicts of Interest for Research on Psychosocial Interventions
Ioana-Alina Cristea et al.
JAMA PSYCHIATRY (2018)
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
Heather Piwowar et al.
PEERJ (2018)
Populating the Data ArK: An attempt to retrieve, preserve, and liberate data from the most highly-cited psychology and psychiatry articles
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2018)
Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017
Oshua D. Wallach et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2018)
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress
Simine Vazire
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Mapping the universe of registered reports
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)
A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science
Olivier Klein et al.
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings
Etienne P. LeBel et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing
Michelle N. Meyer
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions
Bobby Lee Houtkoop et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established
Deborah A. Zarin et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
Denes Szucs et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2017)
Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission
Philip E. Bourne et al.
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY (2017)
Good enough practices in scientific computing
Greg Wilson et al.
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY (2017)
Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science
Simine Vazire
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
Journal Data Sharing Policies and Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies in Psychology
Michele B. Nuijten et al.
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
A manifesto for reproducible science
Marcus R. Munafo et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2017)
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
John P. A. Ioannidis
MILBANK QUARTERLY (2016)
IS THERE A REPRODUCIBILITY CRISIS?
Monya Baker
NATURE (2016)
Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study
Anisa Rowhani-Farid et al.
BMJ OPEN (2016)
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
Shareen A. Iqbal et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency
Mallory C. Kidwell et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
The Virtuous Cycle of a Data Ecosystem
Bradley Voytek
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY (2016)
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
Richard D. Morey et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2016)
Underreporting in Psychology Experiments: Evidence From a Study Registry
Annie Franco et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2016)
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
Sara Steegen et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Promoting an open research culture
B. A. Nosek et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use
Jayne F. Tierney et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2015)
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
LANCET (2014)
Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
E. Miguel et al.
SCIENCE (2014)
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2014)
Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation
Jonathan Kimmelman et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2014)
The Value of Direct Replication
Daniel J. Simons
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
The Evolution of Trial Registries and Their Use to Assess the Clinical Trial Enterprise
Kay Dickersin et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2012)
Psychologists Are Open to Change, yet Wary of Rules
Heather M. Fuchs et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
Matthew C. Makel et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting
John P. A. Ioannidis
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Public Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals
Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Iain Chalmers et al.
LANCET (2009)
Unavailability of online supplementary scientific information from articles published in major journals
E Evangelou et al.
FASEB JOURNAL (2005)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research - A systematic review
JE Bekelman et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2003)
Share Paper
