4.1 Article

LGBT 'Communities' and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy

Journal

SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 8-26

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1360780420974031

Keywords

relationships; risk; safety; self-censorship; self-surveillance; sexuality

Categories

Funding

  1. Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/J011894/1]
  2. AHRC [AH/J011894/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article is based on UK research that explores the understanding and experiences of LGBT+ 'community' through the perspectives of over 600 LGBT+ individuals. The study reveals the regulation and shaping of intimacy within social interactions, as well as the influence of various forms of discrimination on intimate relations.
This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT 'community'. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of 'LGBT community' was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people's feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT 'communities' were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people's experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT 'communities'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available