4.3 Article

Working Conditions in Global Value Chains: Evidence for European Employees

Journal

WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 701-721

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0950017020986107

Keywords

global value chains; social upgrading; well-being of workers; working conditions

Funding

  1. National Science Centre, Poland (Narodowe Centrum Nauki -NCN) [DEC2015/19/B/HS4/02884]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that participation in global value chains is negatively related to wages, with workers in more deeply involved sectors having lower and less stable earnings but are less likely to work overtime, indicating worse working conditions. The analysis of social implications of increasing involvement of countries in global production must compare wage effects of GVCs with other complex changes in workers' well-being.
This article investigates a sample of almost nine million workers from 24 European countries in 2014 to conclude how involvement in global value chains (GVCs) affects working conditions. We use employer-employee data from the Structure of Earnings Survey merged with industry-level statistics on GVCs based on the World Input-Output Database. Given the multidimensional nature of the dependent variable, we compare estimates of the Mincerian wage model with zero-inflated beta regressions focused on other aspects of working conditions (overtime work and bonus payments). Wages prove to be negatively related to involvement in GVCs: workers in the more deeply involved sectors have lower and less stable earnings, implying worse working conditions. However, they are also less likely to have to work overtime. We prove that the analysis of social implications of increasing involvement of countries in global production must compare wage effects of GVCs with other aspects of complex changes in workers' well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available