3.8 Article

I would not have taken her for his sister: financial hardship and women's reputations in the Hartlib circle (1641-1661)

Journal

SEVENTEENTH CENTURY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 47-64

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0268117X.2021.1896377

Keywords

Republic of letters; gender history; reception studies; hartlib circle; epistolary studies

Funding

  1. European Research Council [615545]
  2. Irish Research Council [Ircia/2019/116]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [615545] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article argues that incorporating the epistolary reception of women writers enriches our understanding of women's experiences in transnational correspondence networks, bringing attention to the ways in which women were perceived by other correspondents and the boundaries imposed on them to be accepted. The focus on the Hartlib circle highlights the experiences of Dorothy Moore and Jean Appelius, showcasing the inseparable ties between women's reputations and financial realities.
Scholarship on transnational correspondence networks has until recently tended to focus on men's intellectual endeavours. While the first phase of feminist scholarship focused on recovery of women's voices, this article argues that incorporating the epistolary reception of women writers (letters written about women writers) enriches our understanding of women's experiences in these networks. It brings attention to the ways in which women were perceived by other (usually male) correspondents, and the boundaries imposed on women in order to be accepted. By focusing on the Hartlib circle, this article highlights the experiences of Dorothy Moore (c.1613-1664) and Jean Appelius (fl. 1638-1648), and showcases the way women's reputations were inseparable from financial realities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available