4.5 Article

Can a Community-Based Football Program Benefit Motor Ability in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder? A Pilot Evaluation Considering the Role of Social Impairments

Journal

JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 402-413

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-021-04933-w

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorders; Organised physical activity; Football; Motor ability; Social skills; Community-based

Funding

  1. Moose Toys, Ferrero Group Australia Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives
  2. MECCA Brands
  3. Wenig Family
  4. Geelong Community Foundation
  5. Grace & Emilio Foundation
  6. Victorian Department of Education and Training
  7. NSW Department of Education
  8. NDIS ILC
  9. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [K23HD099275]
  10. Australian Football League

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This pilot study found that a community football program had a positive impact on the motor abilities of children with autism spectrum disorder, particularly in aiming and catching. Social impairments may play a role in affecting these abilities.
This non-randomised pilot study evaluated the impact of a community football program on motor ability in children aged 5-12 years with autism spectrum disorder. Sixteen children were evaluated at baseline-and-post attendance in a football program for a varied number of weeks and compared to 19 children engaging in treatment-as-usual. Primary analyses indicated a statistically significant increase in total MABC-2, aiming and catching, and balance scores for the intervention group, with no changes in scores in the comparison group. There were no changes in manual dexterity across either group. At a between group level, the changes in aiming and catching scores were significantly greater for the intervention group. Further analyses highlighted the potential importance of social impairments regarding aiming and catching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available